Customers · two firms · private deployment

Anonymous
on purpose.

Institutional decision intelligence is, by definition, the firm's most sensitive substrate. Naming customers in a marketing page is the wrong shape of incentive. Two deployments are live. Here is what they look like in production.

CASE · 01 GBP 70BN AUM · GLOBAL EQUITIES SINCE Q2 2024

A sector breach
and a precedent from Sydney.

A long-only global equities desk runs the Global Growth Fund against a hard sector-concentration mandate. A corporate action on a held position pushed technology exposure 60 bps over the cap. The default playbook: force the sale.

G-Nosis surfaced an 18-month-old decision from the Sydney desk. Same fund. Same constraint. Resolved with a 30-day cure window instead of a forced sale. The PM had never seen the prior decision; the analyst who originally drafted it had moved teams.

The cure window was approved. Execution slippage avoided. The new decision now sits in the graph as a precedent of its own.

DEC-2147 Mandate breach · sector cap +0.6% PROPOSED · 09:14 GMT
RULE-114 RULES-V5 §sector-concentration FIRED · 09:14:02
DEC-1893 Sydney · same fund · cure window CITED · 18M
RISK VaR +0.04% · liquidity tier 2 RE-PRICED
DEC-2147 Cure window approved · sealed 09:14:48
~ GBP 14M execution slippage avoided
94 sec trigger to sealed
18 months precedent recall depth
CASE · 02 HIGH-YIELD CREDIT · MULTI-STRAT SINCE Q4 2024

Six hours of IC prep,
down to twenty-two minutes.

A high-yield credit team runs an investment committee twice a week. Each agenda item is a credit, and each credit drags six hundred prior decisions behind it: covenant negotiations, restructuring votes, sponsor concessions, triggered baskets.

Pre-G-Nosis, the analyst spent the day before each IC reconstructing precedent from PDFs, deal closing binders, and the memory of whichever partner had been in the room. Six hours, on a good day.

With the schema populated to nineteen edge types — including CITES_PRECEDENT, VIOLATES_LIMIT, and a firm-specific COVENANT_OPENED — IC prep is a single trace query. Twenty-two minutes, by the analyst's own stopwatch.

QUERY trace(credit:apex_holdings, hops=4) + 0.4s
DEC-0871 Covenant relaxed · springing lien · 2023-Q3 CITED
DEC-1402 Sponsor concession · margin step-up CITED
RULE-22 §covenant-baskets fired retroactively SCHEMA · V5
IC-AGENDA Compiled · 47 prior decisions surfaced 22 MIN
22 min average IC prep · down from 6h
19 → 4 edge types in 14 months
600+ prior decisions addressable
Three things both have in common

Write-path adoption,
incremental schema,
irreversible.

01 · WRITE-PATH ADOPTION

Both firms adopted G-Nosis by writing decisions as part of the work, not after. The capture happens at the moment the decision is made. Nothing is reconstructed from memory or memo.

02 · INCREMENTAL SCHEMA

Neither firm started with 27 edge types. Both began with four — proposal, rule fire, approval, citation — and expanded the schema as desks discovered edges they cared about. The graph grew with the firm.

03 · IRREVERSIBLE

When asked what would happen if G-Nosis disappeared tomorrow, both teams gave the same answer in different words: we cannot imagine going back. The trace is now load-bearing for daily work.

Onboarding

A schema first.
Software second.

We onboard firms that can articulate the decision schema they want preserved. The first conversation is a working session with your desk to write v0. Five working days to reply.